The court reviewed and clarified the definition of a "dependent" under the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule.

Security National Insurance Co. v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co., [2013] O.J. No. 5661, December 9, 2013, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, E.M. Morgan J.

Continue Reading...

The court relied on grammar and punctuation to conclude a coverage provision was not ambiguous and the plain meaning was that coverage did not apply.

1088437 Ontario Inc. (c.o.b. Northmore Fuels) v. GCAN Insurance Co., [2013] O.J. No. 5407, November 28, 2013, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, J.R. MacKinnon J.

Continue Reading...

The insurer’s appeal from a decision that the insurer had a duty to defend a third party claim issued against the insureds in a personal injury action was dismissed. The third party claim fell within the general coverage provision, and the wording of the household exclusion clause did not apply to exclude an indirect, third party claim from coverage.

Bawden v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co., [2013] O.J. No. 5385, November 26, 2013, Ontario Court of Appeal, D.H. Doherty, S.T. Goudge and P.D. Lauwers JJ.A.

Continue Reading...

The court gave effect to the terms of an insuring agreement for a professional liability claims-made-and-reported policy, which provided that the failure to disclose any situation or circumstance which may in the future result in a claim excluded coverage of any action subsequently emanating therefrom. As coverage for this action never existed, the insured could not seek relief against forfeiture.

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. All Spec Home Inspections, [2013] O.J. No. 5246, November 19, 2013, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, J.W. Quinn J.

Continue Reading...

The issuer of a comprehensive general liability policy brought an application seeking a declaration that the issuer of an excess liability policy was required to contribute to defence costs incurred on behalf of their common insured. The Court of Appeal upheld a decision holding that there was no overlapping coverage for defence costs under the policies and, therefore, the excess insurer had no duty to contribute to the defence costs.

ACE INA Insurance v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Ltd., [2013] O.J. No. 5162, November 14, 2013, Ontario Court of Appeal, E.E. Gillese, R.G. Juriansz and G.R. Strathy JJ.A.

Continue Reading...

No-fault statutory benefit insurer had no right to bring crossclaim against disability insurer for reimbursement of benefits paid by no-fault insurer when disability insurer had denied liability to the insured.

Ng. v. Cole, [2013] O.J. No. 4867, October 24, 2013, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, J.C. Murray J.

Continue Reading...

Court sets aside noting in default on the basis that delivering a statement of claim to an insurer demonstrates an intention to defend.

Economical Mutual Insurance Co. v. Montgomery, [2013] O.J. No. 4753, October 22, 2013, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Master R. Dash

Continue Reading...

The insured commenced an action to recover caregiver benefits, non-earner benefits, and additional damages under her motor vehicle liability policy which provided for statutory accident benefits over three years after the insurer refused to pay benefits. The limitation period was not extended by a mediation after the date of the insurer's refusal to pay, or a subsequent application for benefits. As a result, the insured's action was statute barred.

Blake v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance Co., [2013] O.J. No. 4413, September 30, 2013, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, A.C.R. Whitten J.

Continue Reading...

Plaintiff's claim against defendant insurance brokers dismissed on basis that plaintiff adduced no expert evidence of standard of care and there was sufficient insurance available to plaintiff.

Midas Investment Corp. v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance Co., [2013] O.J. No. 3403, July 22, 2013, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, K.E. Swinton J.

Continue Reading...

Insurer obligated to pay for insured's full-time care under Ontario Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule---Effective September 1, 2010, and not just for care provided during the 40 hours per week when the insured's mother would have been working but for the accident.

Henry v. Gore Mutual Insurance Co., [2013] O.J. No. 3792, July 16, 2013, Ontario Court of Appeal, J.M. Simmons, A. Hoy and G.R. Strathy JJ.A.

Continue Reading...